Cancer Treatment

Sunday, December 16, 2012

Parasitic Asylum seekers and British woman who cant get cancer treatment

Parasitic Asylum seekers and British woman who cant get cancer treatment ?
I have just seen a item of the news regarding a british mother of three who cannot get cancer treatment on the national health partly because the drug is new and how the cost is prohibitive. Frankly this disgusts me a country who can squander funds for scrounging wasters like asylum seekers who culturally have nothing in common with the continent and country they are coming to. The average tax payer is getting a raw deal why should we be providing for another continents people,when the immediate local country is where they should go to claim asylum e.g. iraqis to saudi, etc.
Current Events - 1 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
I'm guessing you didn't see the documentary on Polish Migrant workers on Channel 4 a couple of nights ago right? It was rather eye opening and informative, Isn't amazing how the tabliods label anyone "different" as an asylum seeking "Scrounging wasters" and its readers take it at face value thinking that is the truth and nothing but the truth, if you actually researched with and open eye without biasism or anything of the kind you might learn a few things contrary to what you might think you know... About the woman who can't get treatment for cancer...do you know WHY they can't give it to her? Just because she has cancer and a mother of 3 she automatically achieves sainthood? For the record that was not a slur on the woman, just saying you should consider ALL the facts before jumping to conclusions, its not as if the NHS/Government is tell all cancer patients to sod off or anything like that, its probably the treatment that she requires hasn't been tested in the uk or isn't considered legal or even available on the NHS (not all of them are) so the NHS can't just up at it and give it to her, far too much red tape to cross through before anything can be done, please put these facts into consideration.

Read more discussions :

Wednesday, December 12, 2012

Cancer treatment - Does it cost the hospitals more to treat patients

Cancer treatment - Does it cost the hospitals more to treat patients?
physically (Canada - free health care) using technology when compared to patients spending money on pharmaceutical drugs. I dont know if that made sense. Practically do you agree with his hospitals spend more to treat patients using technology than patients spend on pills at pharmacies
Cancer - 1 Answers

Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
Cancer treatment has all modalities. Surgery, Radiotherapy, chemotherapy and others like immunotherapy. Surgery and Radiotherapy need a lot of infrastructure in the hospital. All modalities need specialists with great learning and experience to treat. It is not just technology versus pills. Most of the cancers need a combined approach for treatment. All are expensive in one way or the other.

Read more discussions :

Saturday, December 8, 2012

Is there a cancer treatment that doesn't involve radiation and or chemo

Is there a cancer treatment that doesn't involve radiation and or chemo?

Cancer - 7 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
Often cancers are treated by surgery alone. My dad had a minor case of prostate surgery, and they were able to treat it simply by removing the tumor and then monitoring it. Is that what you meant? And there are other "new age" treatments, but you would have to a be a suicidal fool to try them.
2 :
Doug - The answer is Yes! That treatment is surgical excision of a single cancer mass when there is no other visible tumor in the body. Sometimes, even the primary cancer and a single metastasis (spread) can be treated with surgery alone. Wider spread in the body usually leads to chemotherapy. Often chemo- or radiation therapy is done to increase the remaining quality of life even though it may not prolong life. Results are usually unpredictable as to how effective the treatment will be for any one person.
3 :
There are lots of them. Generally referred to as alternative modalities. Naturpaths and Homeopaths have been using them sucessfully for years. One of the oldest and most popular is a formulation called Essiac. Commonly available as a tea or a tincure 1000s attest to its effectiveness. It is also low cost and entirely without dangerous chemicals, which means no dangerous side-effects. There are any number of good reference sites including: www.essiaccancer.com and www.thesecretsofeden.com
4 :
yes...it is up to you.
5 :
Surgery of course, and you can google monoclonal antibodies but they are generally used with chemo.
6 :
It depends on the kind of cancer you are referring to. If you just want to know in general surgery is usually the best chance for cure with solid tumor cancers. Other treatments are immunotherapy and hormonal therapy.
7 :
Years ago my grandma had stomach cancer, pancreatic cancer, and colon cancer that had all reached throughout her body and into her lymph nodes. Her doctors only gave her a few months to live - if that. So she made out her obituary and got ready to die. She also made up a concoction which proved very useful and actually healed the cancer - proven. She used a half cup of kerosine (kerosene) and a half cup of olive oil and mixed it together. She then soaked a towel in it and placed it directly on her skin. - I would warn that if you do decide to do this please do not be by an open flame or smoke. It took about 2 weeks before she started getting any relief. But it did cure her. She is now 95 years old and still kicking. The only side effect of this I know of is the bad smell of kerosine. If you have any further questions please email me at pjdelaney@live.com as I would like to be able to help as many people as I can.

Read more discussions :